Compare
See how Zerq compares on control, workflows, developer experience, and AI—so you can run everything in your environment without lock-in.
We compare deployment flexibility, native workflow builder, developer portal, role-based access, per-partner controls, AI agent access, and built-in metrics and audit.
We focus on what matters for regulated enterprises: one platform, full control, no lock-in.
Compare Zerq with Kong, Apigee, AWS, Azure, MuleSoft, Tyk, and WSO2. Checkmark indicates full support; partial or add-ons indicate limited or extra cost; warning indicates limited support.
| Feature | Zerq | Kong | Apigee | AWS | Azure | MuleSoft | Tyk | WSO2 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Self-hosted | ||||||||
| Workflow builder (native) | partial | partial | partial | |||||
| Developer portal | partial | partial | partial | |||||
| Role-based access | partial | partial | partial | partial | partial | |||
| Per-partner access | partial | partial | partial | partial | partial | |||
| Enterprise auth ready | ||||||||
| Metrics & audit included | add-ons | add-ons | partial | partial | partial | |||
| Caching & streaming | partial | partial | ||||||
| One gateway for REST and AI | partial | |||||||
| Platform automation (ops/automation) |